Ebenezer Scrooge Essay Example

Ebenezer Scrooge Paper Even dogs didnt like him; they would pull their owners way from Scrooge as if they were scared of him. And then wag their tails to say an evil eye is worse than being blind. No beggars implored him to bestow a trifle. This is another sentence which shows how people are scared of him. Everyone knows that he is rich but not even a beggar asks him for anything because they already know of how much of a cold-hearted person he is. Two charity workers come to Scrooge and ask for money for the poor and need but Scrooge gives them nothing and tells them to go away. I wish to be left alone, said scrooge. I help support the establishments I have mentioned: they cost enough: and those who are badly off must go there. Many cant go there; and many would rather die. If they would rather die, said Scrooge, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population. This also shows the way Scrooge treats other people. He kicks out these people who are working for good because Scrooge says that he is already helping the poor enough by supporting the establishments which are union workhouses and prisons. Scrooge shows how nasty he is by saying that they should die if they want to and decrease the growing population. We will write a custom essay sample on Ebenezer Scrooge specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Ebenezer Scrooge specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Ebenezer Scrooge specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Scrooge treats these workers rudely like they are trying to steal his money, and they come for the poor but Scrooge doesnt care about the poor or want to help them so he just treats the workers nastily and makes them leave. Scrooge treats everyone badly; this also includes his family. He treats his nephew sarcastically because his nephew, as a strong believer in celebrating Christmas, makes a speech about it to Scrooge. After his speech Bob Crachit; Scrooges apprentice, claps in approval of the speech. This is Scrooges reply: Let me hear another sound from you, said Scrooge, and youll keep your Christmas by losing your situation. Youre quite a powerful speaker, sir, he added, turning to his nephew. I wonder you dont go into Parliament. Scrooge treats his nephew with sarcasm by say he should go into Parliament. His apprentice clapped towards the speech and Scrooge angrily reacted by threatening to sack him if he were to make another sound. Scrooge also treats Bob Crachit very nastily. From what I know later in the novel when Scrooge used to be a apprentice of someone he used to be treated very nicely and be very happy with what he did. But now when he has an apprentice Scrooge treats Bob harshly: Scrooge kept the coal-box in his own room; and so surely as the clerk came in with the shovel, the master predicted that it would be necessary for them to part. This shows how Scrooge treats Bob. Bob has a very little fire with one piece of coal in it, so he goes to get some more coal so he can make the fire bigger to warm up. Then before Bob can put the coal in the fire Scrooge says that he would be sacked if he were to use the coal. Scrooge will not even let his apprentice warm up or have at least a happy time like Scrooge did when he was younger as an apprentice. Scrooges attitude towards other people shocks the reader as they see that Scrooge doesnt like to interact with anyone. He likes to be alone and miserable. As a result we feel that Scrooge is just a miserable man who doesnt like to see other people having fun. I think Scrooge likes to be alone because of the way he was treated by his father when he was younger; he used to be left alone in a little dull room. Dickens uses a lot of techniques. In every paragraph there is a meaning, and to describe Scrooge he uses a paragraph for every little thing. I think the most interesting and effective technique Dickens uses is when he describes something, for example Scrooge, he goes into a lot of detail using lots of adjectives and making the image easier to see in your head. The language he uses is old English but it is still easy to understand because of the image Dickens puts in your head of whatever he is writing about. My opinion of what I think this novels message is supposed to be is it is directed towards the people of the time he wrote this novel. It was the time of the industrial revolution; people had forgotten about Christmas or had no time for it because they were working too hard in factories. In summary I think Dickens wanted to revive the Christmas spirit into Britain with this novel. I think he wanted our attitudes to Christmas to be happy and cheerful and not to forget it. And by writing A Christmas Carol he has accomplished that.

Harry Potter Essay Example

Harry Potter Essay Example Harry Potter Essay Harry Potter Essay Many parents and school boards have challenged the presence of these books in libraries and school curricula. While Rolling attempts to represent the connection between good and evil in the Harry Potter series, many feel that series contents depict violence because the story deals with ghosts, cults and encourage cheating, corruption, lying and witchcraft; these ideas oppose several of the teachings of The Bible. Many disputes have risen over the series contents, especially in regards to its effect on young children. J. K. Rolling Harry Potter series has been questioned for its supposed inappropriate content and Its frequent use of Which supporting philosophies and has been banned and challenged In many schools and libraries worldwide since its publication in 1998. J. K. Rolling shows the ultimate victory of good overcoming evil through messages that embody love and courage In her novels J. K. Rolling expresses that the evil she portrayed In her novels was intentional. She utilizes evil characters such as Lord Voltmeter who has the ability to make others his slaves by dwelling in their bodies because she couldnt pretend that when dealing with evil, no one gets hurt (Rolling). The novel was banned in Zealand, Michigan shortly after its publication. Gary L. Fenniest, Superintendent of schools in Zealand, made a restriction on reading, sherries in school environment in any kind of way after he first read the books. Many concerned parents started to complain when their kids would go home and tell them scary stories about witches and goblins that involved spells. : Rev. Lori Joe Speeches, a worried parent expresses that as we expose our kids to the occult, we expose our kids to blood, to violence, and desensitizing them to that, (Savage). They let that their kids were not mature enough to handle such abrupt violence and did not want them to come home with new ideas that would eventually lead to their own downfall. As most parents would, they believed in keeping their kids away from evil by limiting their access to it. Some parents suggested that this kind of exposure to occult (Savage) will eventually lead to deadly violence such as the shooting that occurred In columbine High school In Littleton, Colorado. The books were supposedly harming their vulnerable children because they believed that their kids are like pongee, and they will soak things up and sometimes store them for a while before they spit them back out (Savings). On November 22 1999, parents and the superintendent decided to take action against this potential harm by making some firm pronouncements. They decided that the Harry Potter series cannot be displayed in school libraries, and if the student desires to read them, they must receive their I OFF As a result, the American Booksellers Foundation For Free Expression, an organization that completely disapproved of the decision, lashed out against the school decision to attics a minority of students and parents by banning the Harry Potter series because it would deprive a majority of students whose parents do not have an issue with this. As the organization became more adamant in its position, the advisory committee recommended reviewing the decision of Fenniest and the school staff. On May 1 1, 2000, Fenniest accepted its recommendation and retained the only the classroom readings for elementary school students. However, the Harry Potter series began to face an increasing number of opposition as the years passed. In the very next year, in March, Harry Potter was banned once again in the I-J. Carol Rockford, Principal of SST Mars Island Church of England School in Chatham, Kent expresses her opinion about the Harry Potter series as a part of the school curriculum. Rockford, speaking on the issue, states that the nature of the stories does not fit in with the schools church ethos (School Bans Harry Potter 1). Rockford and the other school staff felt that the books did not match up with their religious beliefs and clashed with the teachings of the bible. In her opinion, they promote what the Bible clearly condemns, I. E. , witchcraft and sorcery (Banes, 5). Expanding on the motive behind the decision, Rockford states, the Bible is very clear and consistent in its teachings that wizards, devils and demons exist and are very real, powerful and dangerous and Gods people are told to have nothing to do with them. We are a Church of England aided primary school which means the church ethos is very important to what we do. (Robinson). Rosewoods strong position about the Harry Potter series in the school library shelves sparked uproar among many. National Secular Society stated that it is wrong to remove the series from schools because it had always been an imagination booster and banning these books would be doing students a great disservice. INS General Secretary Keith Portentous makes a comment that Childrens imaginations have been nourished for centuries with stories of wizards, witches and fairies (School Bans Harry Potter 1). From the US, Author J. K. Rolling defended her books and said that the books are in fact moral. She states that the good and evil is hat shapes the story, and that the novels needed to include such ingredients to honestly tell their stories. (School Bans Harry Potterl). This did not stop Carol Rosewoods and the school staffs firm decision. In 2005, Genuine County, Georgia, Laura Mallory argued to ban the Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Cabana from J. C Magical Elementary school, where her four kids attended school. Originally from Louisville, she argued that since teachers do not assign books such as the Bible for student reading, Harry Potter should not be assigned either Mallory thought that the kooks are harmful to children. She said, The good characters lie, cheat and steal and are not punished. The stories encourage children to perform spells and promote Which. (Diamond). Mallory trusts the school system to protect her precious young children and she certainly doesnt want them indoctrinated into Wisconsin (Ban Harry Potter or face more school shootings). As a result of Mallory attempt to ban the books, Genuine officials argued that the books are a good learning tool and encourage children to read and to spark creativity and imagination (Ban Harry Potter or face more school shootings). The School Board argued that banning books Victoria Sweeney, an attorney representing the Gannett County Board of Education, expressed that it would be wrong to remove the book from schools based on one persons opinion. On December 14, 2006, the Georgia Board ruled that there is no reason for the books to be banned, thus stating that the parent failed to prove her point that the series promotes the Which religion and therefore that the books availability in public schools does not constitute advocacy of a religion (Harry Potter ND the Prisoner of Cabana). The books were also banned in Wakefield, Massachusetts when Rev Ron Barker, SST. Josephs pastor, removed the books from the school libraries claiming that witchcraft and magic are not appropriate enough to be a part of a Catholic school. While many agreed with Barker, many other students and parents were upset about the decision because it was made without notice. Rick Hudson, a parent who has sent his three children to SST. Josephs School, expressed that he was upset that this was done in the first place but he was more upset that it as done in secret. A mother, who asked that her name not be used, said, l think the spirit of what hes doing is the right thing. I believe he is sincerely interested in the childrens well-being. (Luggage). She trusts Barkers Judgment and believes he would never do harm for the students. Ever since its original publication in 1998, J. K. Rolling Harry Potter has sparked much controversy over the years. As one of the most banned books, it is no surprise that many parents and school boards challenge the presence of the books in libraries and school curricula. According to he American Library Association, every year from 1999 to 2002, Harry Potter topped the list of titles challenged or targeted for censorship Len 2003, it ranked second (Bald, 125). Rolling attempt to represent the association between good and evil failed in many places in the United States and other countries as well. J. K. Rolling Harry Potter series is a work that has been questioned for its supposedly violent content and particularly its repeated use of philosophies behind witchcraft that promote Which, and as a result, has been banned or challenged in many schools and libraries around the world.

Ethical Issues of Lay Offs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Ethical Issues of Lay Offs - Essay Example Lay-offs are defined as â€Å"suspension or termination of employment (with or without notice) by the employer or management.† (Business Dictionary 2009) Layoffs are management’s option when faced with situations such as financial difficulties, positions are no longer required, business slow-down, or work interruption. This could be categorized as follows: to save the company, to change, and to improve the company. Regardless of the rationale, layoffs cause undue stress, emotional pain, anguish and suffering for the terminated employees. On the other hand, the managers who are assigned to deliver the blow are also faced with sorrow or guilt, as the case may be. It is in this regard that layoffs are closely evaluated in terms of ethical issues which arise due to the critical consequences that arise. Due to these consequences, layoffs become controversial ethical issues. Velasquez & Rostankowski (1982) averred that â€Å"an act with ethical or moral consequences is that such an act involves decisions freely taken that will have positive or negative consequences for others†. According to Gilbert (2000), â€Å"in some circumstances, laying off some employees is the ethical thing to do, and managers who fail to do so are guilty of unethical conduct. In other circumstances, no ethical defense of layoffs can be found, and managers who decide on layoffs in these circumstances are guilty of unethical acts. In a wide range of circumstances in between, there are ethical arguments for and against layoffs.† To determine the morality of a decision or an action, one approach is that of utilitarianism which holds that a moral decision or action is one that results in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. (ibid.) Using this approach, management justifies that it is common to layoff on the basis that terminating 1000 personnel if this move will save the organization from bankruptcy and hence preserve the jobs of 5000 others.